Sam Brown wrote:
The issue at hand is that [productname] is completely
compliant, but is more modern than HTML 4.01.

Which either means XHTML (in the best case) or some proprietary, extended farce masquerading as HTML4+bells/whistles (in the worst case).


So which one was it?

--
Patrick H. Lauke
_____________________________________________________
re�dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com

******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************



Reply via email to