There is some CSS3 support in Firefox and maybe Opera, I believe. --Zachary
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:02:22 -0500, ByteDreams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm a newbie, I admit, so allow me to ask a dumb question. Are there any > browsers currently supporting some of these CSS3 modules? I sure would like > to try some experimental stuff with these tags if there are... > > ByteDreams > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dean Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <wsg@webstandardsgroup.org> > Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 10:40 AM > Subject: Re: [WSG] CSS3.0 > > > I realise that many people have already responded. > > Sorry for the echo. I'm not in the CSS working group, but > > I do work for W3C. > > > > On 17 Feb 2005, at 10:31, David R wrote: > > > > > Just out of curiosity... > > > > > > Is the CSS3.0 Spec finalised, or are they still accepting suggestions > > > and comments? > > > > I'm not sure there will ever be a CSS 3.0 spec. Rather, CSS 3 (the > > technology) consists of a number of modules. Some modules are further > > along the standardisation process than others. I'm also not sure that > > the CSS WG have ruled out adding new modules or removing existing ones > > (for a good reason of course :). Maybe once all the modules are W3C > > Recommendations, there will be a proclamation that CSS 3 exists. > > > > Are we still accepting comments? Yes. We accept comments at any time in > > the process. Some Web Essentials 04 attendees may remember somewhere > > during one of my incomprehensible rants I mentioned that the phases > > "Last Call" and "Candidate Recommendation" are very important because > > there is an obligation for the W3C to respond to every comment (no > > matter from where it comes). Most Working Groups try to respond to all > > comments all the time, but that can be very time consuming (especially > > for a popular tech like CSS). > > > > So please, send in your comments. On anything W3C-related. > > > > In my perfect world, you'd all feel as if you are part of W3C. You > > already have a huge influence on the work, even though you may not be > > the ones sitting around a table and fighting. > > > > > > > > Because I really want to suggest "multiple background images" for > > > CSS3.0 (provided it isn't suggested already) > > > > Multiple people have pointed at yesterday's draft which has this > > feature. > > > > [Aside: My personal opinion, as someone who is more graphics oriented, > > is that this solution still needs work] > > > > > Where do I find the "Suggestion Box" for the W3C? ;) > > > > For CSS, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Dean > > -- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ****************************************************** > > The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > > > > See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > > for some hints on posting to the list & getting help > > ****************************************************** > > > > > ****************************************************** > The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > > See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > for some hints on posting to the list & getting help > ****************************************************** > > -- ================================================== "The best way to predict the future is to invent it." [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.hopkinsprogramming.net ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
