Steven wrote: > Also, excuse my slight ignorance here, but just because a page validates as > XHTML and CSS compatible, does that make it accessible?
True. It doesn't even necessarily mean that it's semantically correct, as there tends to be a trend in pages that just consist of a load of divs rather than appropriate elements such as paragraphs, lists, headings, etc. Standards compliance means more than just ensuring that web pages validate. Consider the number of people who add ECMAScript to their pages to add invalid attributes to the DOM, just so that it validates, and the author can continue to use features not included in the DOCTYPE. Best regards, Gez _____________________________ Supplement your vitamins http://juicystudio.com ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
