Hi Peter I am really interested in Textpattern, but like many others want to retain XHTML/CSS validation when clients make changes.
> Another enthusiastic endorsement of Textpattern. I've used it a number of > times in scenarios where the client wants to update the site themselves (see > www.fluidwav.com as an example). I've also used it to manage more complex > sites, where static pages would just be way too difficult to maintain > (www.digroup.ca). I am very limited when it comes to php, but textpattern > allows me to exploit many of the server-side benefits of scripting without > having to write a single line of code. I have just looked at both your sites (they're very impressive BTW), but there were some validation problems on the pages I looked at. Can you tell me whether the sites were XHTML/CSS valid when they went live? And if so, has the client's use of Textpattern thrown them out since? Thanks Sarah :) -- XERT Communications email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] office: +61 2 4782 3104 mobile: 0438 017 416 http://www.xert.com.au/ web development : digital imaging : dvd production ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
