Collin,
Then why would W3C use it on their own site? This is the first 4 lines of their source code for their home page:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en-US" lang="en-US"> <head profile="http://www.w3.org/2000/08/w3c-synd/#";><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
I'm not being argumentative....just curious. -- Carol
Collin Davis wrote:
Patrick:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-media-types/
It clearly states that HTML 4 SHOULD be served as text/html, XHTML 1.0 (HTML
compatible) MAY be served as text/html and XHTMl 1.0 (other) and XHTML Basic
/ 1.1 SHOULD NOT be served as text/html
****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
