Matthew Cruickshank wrote:
David Nicol wrote:

I would be very grateful if someone could direct me to an existing
resource or article addressing the subject of how a validly-coded web
site can fail to be truly accessible. i.e. why valid code is not, in
itself, enough to guarantee accessibility.



A slightly different take on it:

"I don't care about accessibility"
http://www.veen.com/jeff/archives/000503.html

and a reply:

"I care about accessibility."
http://www.bestkungfu.com/?p=453

I don't think either would disagree with each other, or what's been said here of course!

I'm starting to think that "standards compliance" is as much a mind-set as anything else. It's about using a range of tools, knowledge, best practice to "craft" (and I think that's a wonderfully appropriate word!) good websites. And that's relevant here because a validly-coded site is likely to have been built by someone who knows and cares about accessibility - ie someone who "gets" standards-compliance.

So, no guarantee that a validly-coded site will be accessible, but a very good pointer to its likelihood.

Mike


****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************



Reply via email to