InfoForce Services (Angus MacKinnon) wrote:
the W3C valildator seems
to like the HTML files.
Don't know which validator you use, but I beg to differ, e.g.
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A//asic.bc.cx/
This page is not Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional!
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A//asic.bc.cx/whatsnew.htm
This page is not Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional!
Is this an endorsement of web standards?
You tell us...
--
Patrick H. Lauke
_____________________________________________________
re�dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
