Kazuhito Kidachi wrote:
I agree this point. I think it should be useful especially for
beginners, and it may prevent them from using presentational names.
The list could be a kind of good "dictionary", I guess.

But, every site has its own name space controlled by its original
naming rule. The list you're suggesting has its own rule, I guess. So,
my suggestion is the list should be given with the rule so that users
can customize the rule and make their own name space.

It should never be a *rule*. This sort of thing can and should only ever fall under the moniker of "best practice examples".


--
Patrick H. Lauke
_____________________________________________________
re�dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com

******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************



Reply via email to