Alan Trick wrote:
When (if)? IE supports HTML it may still want to be able to support it's old buggy <object>. Just look at all their CSS bugs they have in the name of 'backwards-compatibily' and 'consistancy'.
But that's my point: XHTML 2 as a specification is not meant to be backwards compatible, so there's no excuse or reason for saying "our XHTML 2 implements it this way so that older browsers can access it as well".
-- Patrick H. Lauke _____________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com
****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
