Michael Cordover wrote:
> Yup, same mechanism. The #anchor has *always* referred to an id in the
> spec, referring to a name as a bit of an "extra feature" (read:
> incompatibility included for fun).
That's a bit arse backwards. 'Name' has been the target of #anchors ('fragment
identifiers') since HTML 1.
Can you imagine how many links would have broken if it had been removed from
html 4?
Geoff.
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
