*Huge* fan as I am of definition lists, I fear this may be taking it
just that little bit too far. ;) Chris is, after all, marking up a
list title. A definition title and its subsequent definition suggests a
much tighter and narrow scope than a general title gives.
Whoops, here comes the massive and earnest discussion after all...
Iain
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Chris W. Parker wrote:
<p>Features:</p>
<ul>
<li>It's big</li>
<li>It's heavy</li>
<li>It's wood</li>
</ul>
At the risk of sparking another cry of outrage and subsequent
discussions, you could use the (badly defined) definition list construct
instead:
<dl>
<dt>Features:</dt>
<dd>It's big</dd>
<dd>It's heavy</dd>
<dd>It's wood</dd>
</dl>
P
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
