Matt,

 

I’ve fixed the background, and will reupload shortly. Unfortunately all of our workstations are widescreen laptops, so while we run higher res, we’re still only 900px high. Thanks for noticing.

 

Regarding the CSS errors – they are all IE hacks, and besides having to add extra stylesheet documents I don’t see a way to make the validator happy. I’m really not interested in the whole conditional comments thing because they declarations get split up and things just get confusing. If you know of a similar hack to _property:value; that achieves the same outcome and validates, please let me know and I’ll change it.

 

 

 

Thanks,

 

Tatham Oddie

Fuel Advance - Ignite Your Idea

www.fueladvance.com


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Vanderhorst
Sent: Monday, 25 July 2005 2:52 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Site Check: Broadleaf

 

The design is very nice but the background image of the tree repeats.  It is not noticeable until the resolution goes beyond 1024x768.  There were some css validation errors as well (http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?profile="">).

Matthew Vanderhorst


Tatham Oddie (Fuel Advance) wrote:

Hi all,

 

I’ve just placed the first page of a new site on our test-drive server:

 

http://testdrive.fueladvance.com/Broadleaf/

 

Which is a redo of:

 

          http://www.broadleaf.com.au/

 

There is also a mock up which shows how it is meant to look:

 

http://fueladvance.com/broadleaf/HomePagePreview.jpg

 

I have tested in IE6 and FF1.0.6PC and it seems to work fine. If a few of you could take a look in other browsers that’d be great.

 

Also, any design / coding suggestions would be greatly appreciated. J

 

 

 

Thanks,

 

Tatham Oddie

Fuel Advance - Ignite Your Idea

www.fueladvance.com

 

 


 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.9.4/57 - Release Date: 7/22/2005
  

Reply via email to