David, One of the main advantages of XHTML for us is that we can use XML storage for the CMS, and just plug this straight into the page. The whole thing is XML. :-)
Thanks, Tatham Oddie Fuel Advance - Ignite Your Idea www.fueladvance.com -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Laakso Sent: Wednesday, 3 August 2005 4:31 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [WSG] Site Check: VVE Tom Livingston wrote: > On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 12:36:39 -0400, David Laakso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> No, this page >> <http://testdrive.fueladvance.com/vve/Dashboard/Default.ashx> is not >> breaking in any of my browsers. >> Regards, >> David Laakso > > > So, XHTML 1.1 is bad because....? > Hi Tom, Tatham has a good -- readable, usable, accessible, content driven-- page going. You might say it is 'cool.' I do not know that XHTML 1.1 is good or bad. I am asking an academic question: what doctype is best for Tatham's 'cool' page? Regards, David Laakso -- David Laakso http://www.dlaakso.com/ ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ****************************************************** ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
