On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 11:24:13 +1000, Webmaster wrote: > Are we not being a bit classist?
(Coming in a little late here, guys - sorry!) Classist not to offer constructive help for a non-standards based implementation? I don't think so, for two main reasons: 1. The list is the web standards group, so a page that doesn't rely on standards is basically off topic. 2. Table-driven development methods involve a bunch of hacks [1] that people here either have never learnt (they joined the field recently) or are very rusty on (haven't used those techniques in years, oh I'm showing my age! ;)). So, the question is either off-topic, or not within our skill base. Either way, the OP won't get an answer. :( IMHO Lea ~ glad to hear you were able to improve the standards compliance within your constraints, Jeff! You'll get there! :) [1] no, thats not elitist either - standards-based methods generally require hacks too ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
