Hi Kenny, You're right, I made an assumption that because they stretched across the entire viewport in 1024X768 then the authors used fluid layouts, which was a mistake on my part, and next time I'll be sure to check their CSS, but it still makes my ask why they ignored 800X600.
Anyway, thanks for the feedback. Kind regards, Mario >> Therefore I'm very curious as to what the general concensus is from my > fellow standards advocates when designing sites using liguid layouts? > > Truely liquid layouts will look fine at any resolution. Your examples are > not liquid layouts. > Your first and last examples use fixed widths, and the middle one uses > *cringe* tables for > layout. If you must use fixed widths, you just have to decide what > resolution you want your > site to look best in, and wish luck to the rest. If you have a liquid > layout, the question of > "best resolution" doesn't apply. But I'm sure there will be plenty of > replies to come that give > you an easier answer, such as "800x600 is best". ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
