On 9/7/05 1:19 AM "John Allsopp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out:
> The simple fact remains, that in my research into some of the biggest > and most popular Australian web sites, not a single site out of about > 100 I have surveyed, which is table based has been valid. And the > errors in table based sites have been almost invariably associated > with the table markup. Umm, so folks who do tables for layout don't care about W3C validation. This is a revelation? Best, Rick Faaberg ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
