James Gollan wrote:
Hi David,
thanks for the feedback. I have to agree that the text, particularly
on the home page, lacks contrast. I will look to make it a little
darker. As for the emphasis being on the designer rather than the
painter, I don't feel this was the case. The painter was very involved
during the design process and, working in the field of visual
communication, very particular about the type of site she wanted. I
actually started out designing a far more standard layout that was
rejected.
My opinion was a gut level 'feeling' as a user-- no personal
implications toward you, or the client, intended.
If you mean that the site fails to communicate and that there are
other issues involved I would be really interested to know what they
are so I can address them.
Thanks again for taking the time (no ideas on the print style?)
My printer serves as a doorstop, so can't help there, either.
Cheers
James
FWIW: The emphasis seems to be on the designer rather than the
painter for whom the site has been designed? I find the text far too
light and unreadable.
Best,
David Laakso
Regards,
David Laakso
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
