Re: [WSG] META tag standards?

[Patricia & Jack]

Best to use lowercase when you are not sure,  but there is not realy a standard for it so far I know..  ;) check also the Meta Tag Analyzer http://www.widexl.com/remote/search-engines/metatag-analyzer.html Its more for keywords and stuff but they have a view tips Also a list of best meta tags to use and taken in by spiders writen by Ben Wiggy: Part1: http://www.benwiggy.com/webdev/metatagtutorial.php Part2: http://www.benwiggy.com/webdev/metatagtutorial_2.php Greetings, Jack Gene Falck wrote: Hi everyone, I've been prowling around in our resources and in Google but I haven't found this. (As usual, I may just not know what to call my question.) I understand about using lower case for tags and attributes in XHTML (leaving content capitalization unspecified to accommodate a wide range of strings) but haven't seen anything on those value items that seem to be relatively frequent and "standard" items. For instance, I see the following variants in the capitalization of values: <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" ... <meta http-equiv="Content-type" ... <meta http-equiv="content-type" ... The Content-Type entry, even though it's a value, certainly looks standard enough to have a right way to write it. Is one of the above a standard or a best practice? Regards, Gene Falck [EMAIL PROTECTED] ****************************************************** The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ****************************************************** ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************