Iam a little bit on the references but....
html {font-size: 100.01%;}
body {font-size: 1em;}
References:
http://www.communitymx.com/content/article.cfm?cid=FAF76&print=true
Bottom of Page mentions this
http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=BrowserBugs
Check http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=BrowserBugs
Jim
On 9/22/05, Gunlaug Sørtun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seriously though; if solving it by setting 'font-size: 100%;' on 'html'
> and em-value on 'body', then better make sure it _is_ '100%' and _no_
> other value on 'html'. Otherwise it looks like we may have a nice, but
> unwanted, variation of font-sizes across browser-land.
>
> Test 1:
> html {font-size: 100%;}
> body {font-size: 1em;}
> ... should result in 1em as base.
>
> Test 2:
> html {font-size: 200%;}
> body {font-size: 0.5em;}
> ... should result in 1em as base.
>
> Test 3:
> html {font-size: 50%;}
> body {font-size: 2em;}
> ... should result in 1em as base.
>
> Only IE/win gave me the indicated results (1em).
> Opera)8.50) and Firefox(1.5b1) didn't agree on anything but test 1.
>
> - Can anyone confirm (or correct) this result?
> - What about other browsers?
--
______________________________________
"Bugs are, by definition, necessary.
Just ask Microsoft!"
www.co.sauk.wi.us (Work)
www.arionshome.com (Personal)
www.freexenon.com (Consulting)
______________________________________
Take Back the Web with Mozilla Fire Fox
http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/
Making a Commercial Case for Adopting Web Standards
http://www.maccaws.org/
Web Standards Project
http://www.webstandards.org/
Web Standards Group
http://www.webstandardsgroup.org/
Guild of Accessible Web Designers
http://www.gawds.org/
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
