> -----Original Message----- > From: Christian Montoya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, 26 September 2005 3:33 AM > To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org > Subject: Re: [WSG] computer arts mag article/review > > Considering none of the top designers use Dreamweaver, I > could care less about a new version.
Dreamweaver is not for design. It's for the step afterwards when you take the work from the designer and make a website out of it. I hope our designer will always use Photoshop, not Notepad. But of course that's a personal preference. Our top programmers all use Dreamweaver, though. And the new Dreamweaver 8 does look interesting (mostly so the feature to expand the code). But as mentioned previously, it does not render all the css correctly yet, so I am not sure if it is worth the money upgrading. ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
