Not only that, visual studio actually changes valid code into invalid
code. For example t'll remove closing LI tags and capitalise all your
tags. I know that, having tried to get a css/xhtml site with  MCMS, at
this stage if you want to make a standards compliant web app C#.NET is
way more trouble than it's worth. Myself I quite like ruby on rials,
but I'd go with what ever your already comfortable with.


Jake

On 27/9/2005, "Matthew Cruickshank" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>Stuart Sherwood wrote:
>> I'm wondering how .net compares as I haven't had the chance yet to
>> build a site with it?
>Current versions of ASP.Net have controls that favour IE over other
>browsers by using proprietary code (Eg. validation controls with
>Javascript use document.all). I think Microsoft have said they'll have
>XHTML compliance with .Net 2.0 but right now it's tag soup. The html is
>chosen by these controls differently for categories of browser, so
><asp:panel> becomes a <div> for IE and a <table> for Firefox (you can
>override this, but it's the default behaviour). And the typical IDE,
>VS.Net, produces mediocre WYSIWYG HTML by default.
>
>Which leaves you with,
>- Using 3rd party controls which may be compliant. Eg, there are
>Ecmascript validation controls but they're not so popular and there are
>integration problems in VS.Net (not sure whose fault this is though).
>- Avoid or minimise the use of poorly written controls and instead write
>strings of html to the page, perhaps by using literal controls as stubs.
>- Using another framework that doesn't use the standard ASP.Net
>templating model.
>
>So yeah, it's pretty bad.
>
>--
>.Matthew Cruickshank
>http://holloway.co.nz/
>
>******************************************************
>The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
>
> See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
>******************************************************
>
******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************

Reply via email to