Okay, most of the points I made still apply. 1) is out, because you've
ditched the JS menu. 2, 3, 4, 5 (less now) and 7 still apply. You've got
images where you could be using background images in a H4 for the
special offers section, and I'd lean towards doing part of your
testimonial bit differently. Perhaps:

<p class="testimonialname"><span>Joe Coyle,</span> President</p> and add
the rule
.testimonialname span {font-weight:bold}
to your CSS, instead of
<p><img src="Images/Icons/comment.gif" width="16" height="16"
alt="Client Testimonial" /><strong>Joe Coyle,</strong> President</p>

...because the name isn't really emphasised (which is what the strong
tag means), only styled differently, and the image has no semantic
weight (you've already said "Client testimonial" in the H2 immediately
above).

Text resizing isn't so bad, if you're prepared to accept your nav bar
breaking so quickly (it only scales one step up in Firefox here).

Only other suggestion I've got is to perhaps stick the "Plans starting
at $24.95/month" server graphic as part of a link background, instead of
just as an image... and, if you _do_ want to retain the image, change
the alt text to something more meaningful than "web servers" -- "Plans
starting at $24.95/month" would do nicely.

Regards,

Josh

On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 00:21 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Josh,
> 
> My sincere apologies!!
> 
> I failed to provide the URL to the development environment for the redesign:
> 
> http://www.webnetdesignstudios.com/index1.htm
> 
> This is my current site, and one of the reasons I've decided to implement a 
> re-design.
> 
> Sorry for the miscommunication.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Mario
> 
> 
> 
> > A few suggestions, in order of markup.
> >
> > 1) The JS menus are okay, if everything listed in them is accessible some 
> > other way.
> >
> > 2) Your non-JavaScript link list (topnavbar) should be a list. And the 
> > bullet images would be
> > better as background images or
> > list-style-image's.
> >
> > 3) Instead of having an image for your header, consider having a H1 that 
> > says "WebNet Design
> > Studios: A Progressive Web Design and Development Group" and use an 
> > image-replacement technique.
> > As the page title, this should carry greater semantic weight than it does 
> > at present, which is
> > why I'd lean towards a H1 rather than a semantically neutral <div> with an 
> > <img> inside.
> >
> > 4) If you change that to be a H1, then (this one is open to conjecture) I 
> > think all the other
> > H1s on your page should become H2, etc.
> >
> > 5) Currently, your H1s have images inside them. Setting padding-left and a 
> > background-image
> > would be a better alternative here. Use id or class to differentiate the 
> > images between headers,
> > if this is what you need (at the minute, it looks like that's what your 
> > design aims for).
> >
> > 6) You have a table that's semantically inappropriate under the Consumer 
> > Shop heading
> > (summary="Consumer Shop" id="table") -- these links should, again, be an 
> > unordered list. To make
> > them use the space more
> > effectively, you can float them to make their appearance emulate a table. 
> > With fluid layouts,
> > this has the added benefit of making
> > "columns" appear to appear and disappear as the layout scales -- though 
> > this isn't a concern
> > here. You can also set a background image for list items instead of 
> > including the <img> tag at
> > the start of each.
> >
> > 7) Finally, your footer should also be a list. I would use an image 
> > replacement technique here
> > again, possibly putting your copyright
> > statement in a separate list to enable correct positioning (if you need 
> > to... it's possible not
> > to, but might be easier that way).
> >
> >
> >
> > AND -- this one is important -- text resizing (up) breaks immediately 
> > because you've set the
> > heights of #integration, #consumer, #special, #starter, #site and #quote in 
> > pixels. Unsetting
> > all of these doesn't particularly break anything, though when resizing the 
> > length of the columns
> > relative to one another does fluctuate somewhat (I'm only
> > testing in Firefox, here). You can fix this by putting your #clear div 
> > INSIDE the #wrapper div,
> > so that #wrapper extends as far as it has to, continuing the white 
> > background all the way down
> > (I think... I've never been completely on top of that whole clearing thing, 
> > so I'm not 100% sure
> > that'll work... the theory runs something like that, though. Play around.)
> >
> >
> > HTH,
> >
> > Josh
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > Joshua Street
> >
> > base10solutions
> > Website:
> > http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
> > Phone: (02) 9898-0060  Fax: (02)
> > 8572-6021
> > Mobile: 0425 808 469
> >
> > Multimedia  Development  Agency
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________ 
> > E-mails and any
> > attachments sent from base10solutions are to be regarded as confidential. 
> > Please do not
> > distribute or publish any of the contents of this e-mail without the 
> > senderĂ¢&#8364;&#8482;s
> consent. If you
> > have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to 
> > the e-mail, and then
> > delete the message without making copies or using it in any way.
> >
> > Although base10solutions takes precautions to ensure that e-mail sent from 
> > our accounts are free
> > of viruses, we encourage recipients to
> > undertake their own virus scan on each e-mail before opening, as
> > base10solutions accepts no responsibility for loss or damage caused by the 
> > contents of this
> > e-mail.
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > ******************************************************
> > The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
> >
> >  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> >  for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
> > ******************************************************
> 
> 
> 
> ******************************************************
> The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
> 
>  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
>  for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
> ******************************************************

******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************

Reply via email to