Hi Terrence,

My post was not a personal attack on Nick, nor was it dismissive of his
POV. Admittedly, I got the impression he was struggling to come up with an example of how alertbox is difficult to use and perhaps that has tainted my message, but I was genuinely interested in whether he truely wanted to
select his articles based primarily on date.

I wouldn't say I was struggling at all. I would agree I was looking for a sensible, grown-up alternative to the kind of honest, gut-reaction that I get when I look at that site. I would say the poor visual quality does not encourage me to revisit the site when there are plenty of alternatives on the web that provide as good information that is also pleasant to use.

Also for more perspective, I am interested in what Jakob Nielsen has to say. For example I just recently listened to an interview with him on ITconversations.com. So really what my reply to you was doing was actually stopping and trying to work out why I rarely visit his website.

I never said that date based scanning was irrelevant - I stated that, in this case, it was secondary to the title, and in fact pointed out what (in
my view) the purpose of the dates were.

Well, I also had in my head the fact that in a dynamic site you can link table headers to sort their columns, which in this apparently "static" site was not an option, so I was probably thinking ahead a bit too much. In any case the point of the table was to have the user go, e.g.:

I want to scan by title so I go down the title column, then across the description to see if the article was relevant, then to the date to see how up-to-date the information may be...or down the date column, etc. In other words using it exactly as a table is meant to be used.

Oh and I didn't feel you were personally attacking me,

Nick

******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************

Reply via email to