Hi Gary
Could you send a sample url?
I have come across some jscript solutions. I've been told that the caption doesn't play nicely with overflow:scroll on the tbody. But I haven't tested it yet.
Thanks
Ted
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gary Menzel
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 3:51 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [WSG] position fixed on the thead
We are using the fixed THEAD/TFOOT extensively and dont have any problems with it.
I also applied the concept to fixing a left hand section - which also worked.
Yes, and while it uses a DIV wrapped around the table (and the fixed sections are anchored to that DIV) it provides the very familiar behaviour the people expect from a table with very minimal CSS.
Is it standard across all browsers? Don't know, don't care. We are only using it in a controlled environment.
Regards,
Gary
On 11/8/05, Terrence Wood < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ted Drake said:
> I'd like to keep the thead fixed and let the remainder of the
> rows scroll underneath it.
I looked around for a solution to this recently. Most solutions rely on
wrapping parts of the table in divs and positioning those, and that just
didn't appeal to me.
I did find this one, which is valid but haven't used it:
http://www.imaputz.com/cssStuff/bulletVersion.html
kind regards
Terrence Wood.
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
I will have to wait until I am work and find the reference.
The solution actually ensures that the head and foot still look like they are part of the table. I.E. the scroll bar still sits alongside the head and foot. I.E. it looks like a real listbox.
Gary
On 11/8/05, Ted Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
