SSI is irrelevant to standards, as the code is parsed by the webserver (and the include file placed in the output code) before the browser/client receives it
Paul -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 1:10 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WSG] Server Side Includes Richard, I use SSI's for my navigation, and I've never had any problems with validation, or structure. Kind regards, Mario > Are there any standards issues around using server side includes? For > example a simple include of another file e.g. > > <-- #include file="test.html" --> > > Does it matter that this is making use of code within comments > (without wishing to start the debate about IE conditional code in > comments again), or is it irrelevant because this will not be seen by the > browser? > > Thanks, Richard Morton > > QM Consulting Ltd ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ****************************************************** ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
