The Snider's Web wrote:
I have been using html 4.01 transitional on my sites and have slowly branched out to xhtml. However, I remember that there has been some discussion on other lists about the 'dangers' of using xhtml.
I know of no dangers with html 4.01 reformulated to proper backwards-compatible xhtml 1.0 served as text/html. That is; apart from the permanent discussion about whether or not xhtml 1.0 should be served as text/html at all, or we should stick to html 4.01 until _all_ browsers can handle anything but text/html and avoid the whole discussion. How you serve xhtml 1.0 will give you different results on a few points in browsers that can handle anything but text/html, and break the entire rendering in those that don't. <http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2004/xhtml-faq> ...may perhaps answer your question _a bit_ more complete. Georg -- http://www.gunlaug.no ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
