Trolling? :) Tip:(unrelated to this dead thread)
I found this good reference: a list of commonly confused HTML special characters http://www.cs.sfu.ca/~ggbaker/reference/characters/#single Paul -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Trick Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 3:36 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [WSG] New logo scheme was talking points for standards I was just thinking about that and I don't think google.com (or for that matter - anything that company creates) would manage to get more than 1 star. On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 12:00 +1100, Peter Williams wrote: > > From: Herrod, Lisa > > > > Who really pays attention to the badges? > > > > Are the badges useful? really? surely an accessibility page > > on the site is more informative and helpful/useful/clear > > to those who are interested. > > > > We work this way because it's best practice and the right > > thing to do; it's faster and more efficient... > > I should point out that I don't use the W3C buttons on any > sites, I try always to make sites comply with standards and > to be functionally efficient. I wouldn't use any new rating > or badge system either unless it was mandated. > > I think it would be amusing to see all the pretty but broken > sites with no stars or 1 star though. > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ****************************************************** ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
