On 12/8/05, Bert Doorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> G'day
>
> Michael Cordover wrote:
> > I think that Google's failure to validate may be due to the simple
> > issue of bandwidth.  Certainly on the main page, the whole source is
> > compressed and effectively minimised.  Bandwidth is expensive these
> > days.  Inserting a doctype, separating style data, that sort of thing,
> > takes a lot of additional bandwidth when you're dealing with hits in
> > the quantities that they do.
>
> I don't follow your logic.
>
> Bandwidth is getting cheaper and cheaper, at least where I live.
>
> Getting rid of tables, font elements etc is likely to make their
> pages lighter, rather than heavier, especially when all
> presentation and behaviour is moved into (cached) external style
> sheet(s) javascript file(s) respectively.
>
> Downloading a style sheet once, or downloading all the
> presentational code on every page view - which one is going to
> cost them more in bandwidth?

Valid CSS based design would definitely improve Google's speed, not hamper it.

I think the reason Google doesn't care is just that they are already
profitable as it is. Companies like Google are driven by profit and
they are the market leader in what they do. If I went to Google and
told them that changing their front end would allow them to reach more
customer and become more profitable, they wouldn't see the need.

And though they have a good laugh with the "do no evil" foolery, they
don't really care if their markup is inaccessible. Someone mentioned
they are back-end programmers, and from dealing with back-end
programmers at school, I know that most of them consider HTML to be
really easy and pointless so they don't bother or care to learn how to
use HTML correctly. If I told them how complex HTML/XHTML/CSS really
is they would think I was crazy.

--
--
Christian Montoya
christianmontoya.com ... rdpdesign.com ... cssliquid.com
******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************

Reply via email to