> kvnmcwebn >> patrick wrote >> "As someone already mentioned, the source order should be >> enough to inform >> what the heading refers to, without the need for explicit >> association." > > sorry i dont understand this could someone please explain?
If you have a heading, followed by some other content (but not a heading of same or higher importance), the heading can be assumed to refer to that content. Fairly simple. <h1>This heading refers to what comes after it</h1> <p>this is part of what the h1 refers to</p> <p>this is also part of what the h1 refers to</p> <h1>Another heading</h1> <p>this is now part of what the other heading refers to</p> <p>this is also part of what the other heading refers to</p> I.e.: the order in which the elements are present in the source code should be enough to determine which heading refers to what... Patrick ________________________________ Patrick H. Lauke Web Editor / University of Salford http://www.salford.ac.uk ________________________________ Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ ________________________________ ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
