Yep... I agree, hence "web [...] recommendations are actually about" rather than "accessibility is actually about". Specs are purpose-agnostic (see pages that validate but are a semantic blight on the face of the web)... ironically, guidelines (human-language, practical documents) are actually more useful for applying technologies than the documents that define the technologies themselves!
Josh On 2/9/06, Lachlan Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > in the end, we *are* catering for > humans. We just need to do so in a way that allows machines to > effectively pass on our messages to the user; and that is what requires > well-defined, computer-readable semantics. ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************