Ok, one last try. My thoughts have little to do with semantics. Semantics are based on standards and languages, and therefore if HTML were dropped, something would HAVE to be introduced to replace it.

However, like the hCard format, trying to break the HTML structure to add semantics to an address on a website seems silly, why not define a new, standard, Address DTD. This way any professional will be able to look up the standard for any data-type he wants. If a data-type has not been defined publicly, then his being forced to use a bunch of meaningless tags seems silly.

Trying to get amateurs to create semantic based sites is largely futile, whatever standards you use, in whatever industry. In these situations, to a UA, there is no difference between:

<div class="heading">Page title</div>
<div class="asa">some text</div>
<div class="para"><span class="firstword">The</span>quick brown</div>


<heading>Page title</heading>
<asa>some text</ada>
<para><firstword>The</firstword>quick brown</para>

Except that it is easier for humans to understand. This IS important because the easier markup is to understand, the easier it is to maintain and the more likely it is to be standards-compliant.

HTML is primarily a text document markup language, a tiny subset of the total information types available on the internet, with extra bits added on. Why does all information have to be presented in this format? Create a new Document DTD, a webpage DTD with things like Title and meta-tag included and then people who don't adhere to these new standards will find that their sites, by default, don't get listed in search engines. Or that browser functionality (like linking addresses to a user's address book) don't work. This will force them to be standards compliant.

Stephen ******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help

Reply via email to