Designer wrote:
I don't understand that. If Safari is capable of handing the correct
mime type, how can (why would) it serve 4.01 strict?
Probably because Safari is cheating :-)
I don't know much about Safari - only use it for basic testing, but the
following turned up in my archives from a discussion I had on the
subject a year or so ago.
1: Don't think Safari has a genuine xml-parser. Suspect Safari to use
the same parser as for 'text/html'.
2: Don't think Safari responds with the right information in the
accept headers. It prefers 'text/html', and "says" so.
Others must know more about this than I do, so I'll leave it at that.
Georg
--
http://www.gunlaug.no
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
