At 3/26/2007 09:19 AM, Kenny Graham wrote:
I don't understand what you mean when you say this involves recursion.
(a)<-+
| |
(b) |
| |
(c)--+
|
(d)
If C takes the route back to A, the whole thing starts back over, so
you'd end up with infinitely nested lists. The only way I can think
of getting around that would be if there were an idref attribute to
embed list items, so you could have <li id="a"> at the top, and then
for C you'd have <li link="a">. That'd be.... fun.
Well, I'm not so sure this is an example of recursion, rather just a
simple loop.
We can certainly use anchors to link from one item to another, but
you'd have to decide on a convention for linking to two different
destinations. Perhaps something like this (caps used for visual clarity):
<ol>
<li id="a">A <a href="b">PROCEED TO B</a></li>
<li id="b">B <a href="c">PROCEED TO C</a></li>
<li id="c">C <a href="d">PROCEED TO D</a> <a href="a">LOOP
BACK TO A</a></li>
<li id="d">D</li>
</ol>
Regards,
Paul
__________________________
Paul Novitski
Juniper Webcraft Ltd.
http://juniperwebcraft.com
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
