Re: [WSG] v's , v's

[Ca Phun Ung]

Hi Robby, As far as I'm aware <strong> is here to stay. HTML and XHTML both support it. Also the page you're referring to doesn't look credible as it advocates using HTML 4.0 as a rule of thumb. Try this: http://www.w3schools.com/tags/default.asp Or if you want the definitive answer take a look at the relevant W3C guidelines. Regards, Ca Phun Robby Jennings wrote: I'm currently collating a coding standards document, and have arrived at the <strong> v's <b> puzzle. I've been preaching the use of <strong> tags as it provides contextual mark-up of content.  The <b> provides inline presentational mark-up which I'm trying to phase out.    I've found this list of  depreciated tags http://www.html-reference.com/depreciated.htm which lists <strong> and <em> as depreciated.   I thought the <b> tag would be depreciated.   So which is correct? What should I be using? I know I can just use <span> tags, and apply css, it's a little clunky to me though.  Any thoughts on this would be welcome.   Cheers,   Robby Jennings UID Developer SEEK Limited Level 2, 3 Wellington St. St Kilda, Victoria, 3182 PH : +61 3 8417 4105  FAX : +61 3 9510 7244 URL : www.seek.com.au Please consider the environment before printing emails.   ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ******************************************************************* ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************