Mordechai Peller wrote:
Semantically, which is better:
<dfn><a></a></dfn>
or
<a><dfn></dfn></a>
My thoughts are the latter, as the <dfn> is closer to the word or phrase
to which it's referring.
In those situations, I always try to reason it out loud to myself...the
one I had quite often in a recent project was
<a><cite></cite></a> vs <cite><a></a></cite>
Am I linking a citation, or citing a link? In my case, it was the former.
In your example: is this the defining instance of a link, or are you
linking a defining instance? I'd think the latter. in your case.
P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
______________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
______________________________________________________________
Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
______________________________________________________________
Take it to the streets ... join the WaSP Street Team
http://streetteam.webstandards.org/
______________________________________________________________
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
