Katrina wrote:
David Hammond suggests that validity is not well-formedness, in that a
document can be well-formed and not valid, but could also be !!! valid
and not well-formed.
http://www.webdevout.net/articles/validity-and-well-formedness#validity_well_formedness
That article is actually only talking about the cases where the W3C
validator has known XML limitations. Despite the validator claiming the
non-well-formed documents are valid, they are not. If you use a
validator that makes use of a real XML parser, the documents would not
validate.
Page Valet has an XML parser available for validation.
http://valet.webthing.com/page/
--
Lachlan Hunt
http://lachy.id.au/
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
