Thanks Theiry, I haven't seen the "voice family" one for quite some time :)
It is all down to personal preference of course. I have found it
easier to have the "hack" directly after the style I am trying to hack
for in the code; that way I don't have to search anywhere for it to
figure out what's going on and it would make it easier for others to
figure out.
IMO: If you take your time you shouldn't need too many hacks anyway,
maybe a box model or two and a peekaboo bug here and there, which
should really only require a "\" or a "* html", not too complex. But
again, that is just down to my experience.
Cheers,
Paul
On 18/05/07, Thierry Koblentz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Behalf Of Paul Collins
> conditional comments gives an excuse to be lazy and just write a whole
> new bunch of styles for IE that could have been fixed in the original
> stylesheet with a bit of playing around. When working on sites built
Do you mean that kind of "playing around"?
div.content {
width:400px;
voice-family: "\"}\"";
voice-family:inherit;
width:300px;
}
html>body .content {
width:300px;
}
FWIW, I prefer to contain fixes in separate styles sheets rather than
forking back and forth in the same file (and that can be done without using
conditional comments).
---
Regards,
Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
--
-----------------------------------------------
Paul Collins
Ph: +44 (0) 793 9038 249 (UK)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
