You are right about the links, they shouldn't be side by side, the div
solution is clearly not best.
Rob mentioned that if the page is viewed with CSS off, the images would
stack up and create a rather long page. That's definitely something to
consider, but most likely something worth compromising to achieve
semantic enlightenment.
Now the choice of UL or OL... a little user testing will go a long way
indeed.
Jason Robb
www.eleventy72.com
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
On Behalf Of Jason Robb
Unless my client needs to show a number with each image, an ordered
list
would be my second choice. I still think a DIV will be the right markup
for the task. Thanks for the input everyone, I really appreciate it.
What's wrong with the UL?
And what about adjacent links:
http://www.w3.org/WAI/wcag-curric/sam82-0.htm
---
Regards,
Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
