Paul Novitski wrote:
>>....Every 40th visitor, on average, will have a bad experience...
>>800x600: 2.5% = 100/2.5 = one in 40 visitors uses 800px-wide
screen resolution (window width not >>mentioned). ...
At 5/31/2007 11:32 PM, kevin mcmonagle wrote:
These visitors probably wouldnt notice the difference between an 800
and 1000 wide layout.
So you're saying that someone using an 800-pixel-wide monitor
probably wouldn't know what it's like to see the same page with a
1000-pixel-wide monitor? And therefore they don't deserve to see a
decent page? What's your logic, and where's your compassion?
In school the teacher has to teach for the dumbest kids in the class
and that ruins it for everyone else.
Oh, I see. So from your perspective life is really like an
elementary school classroom, and we're really like little
ten-year-olds pouting because we're too spoiled and lazy to advance
ourselves when the teacher is paying attention to the stupid, mute,
blind, and crippled kids. Oh my god.
You're advocating a paradigm in which we can win only if someone else
loses. "There ain't enuf pixels on this ranch fer the two of us,
Jethro!" *Pow!* *pow!* *splat!*
Unless, of course, it's possible that intelligent design can provide
a decent page for everyone.
That, however, requires a real winner. It takes the motivation to
make everyone succeed and the intelligence to figure out how to make
it work, the compassion to care about people different from ourselves
and the brilliance to find solutions where others have failed.
Are you up for the challenge?
Regards,
Paul
__________________________
Paul Novitski
Juniper Webcraft Ltd.
http://juniperwebcraft.com
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
