Sander Aarts wrote:
I prefer it above SWFObject as it seems to be more web standards compliant. Well that's what Bobby says himself anyway ;-) in this A list Apart article about Flash embedding:

I like the UFO approach, but I found that it is not the best option if you have to dynamically apply variables (example: width/height) via, for example, a CMS...

My last project this was the case... I needed to give the UFO script a dynamic width/height but I did not have access to the <head> due to the nature of the CMS I was using.

swfObject was much more useful in this situation.

Cheers,
M

--
Wishlists: <http://snipurl.com/1gqpj>
   Switch: <http://browsehappy.com/>
     BCC?: <http://snipurl.com/w6f8>
       My: <http://del.icio.us/mhulse>


*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************

Reply via email to