Hi Mark On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 21:42 +1200, Mark Harris wrote: > James Jeffery wrote: > > No all meta tags are depreciated, and i cant see them being either, google > > still uses the meta="description" , as also bruce has pointed out. > > > > Not to pick on you, James, because Bruce already used it, but the word > is "deprecated" not "depreciated".
Actually I didn't use the word at all in my post. > And before someone picks on me for being a spelling-nazi, the words have > significantly different meanings, and it's important to use the right one. Thanks for pointing out the difference, was a new one to me. I actually think that in the context that meta tags have "depreciated" (lost value over time) in a SEO sense. I'd tend to see "deprecated" as a more technical term and as far as I know meta tags have not been marked as deprecated in current specifications. Anyway English is not my favourite subject but if you'd like to debate it further lets do it off list. Cheers Bruce -- Bruce Morrison Solution Architect designIT Pty Ltd Website Content Management Specialists ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
