Sorry, the point I'm making is why use 100 and 102, is there any visible
difference?
I would have thought the user would need to have a massive default font
size to see any. However I have noticed myself that the way the browsers
tend to size fonts can be quite strange. Sometimes a change of 5% in
scaling can result in the same font ending up the same size however
notably wider.
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
Jixor - Stephen I wrote:
Wouldn't all those heading sizes would look fairly similar,
especially 102%?
Indeed, but those are the sizes I found suitable for my own site, and I
have only *suggested* (over at css-d) those values for use on other
sites - as part of a method for inheriting font-sizes down the entire
chain of containers in a web page.
Designers should of course choose the values that suits their particular
designs, and that was made clear in the thread that suggestion is copied
from.
regards
Georg
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
