On 7/9/07 (11:50) Rahul said: >Try the Chelsea Creek Studio: >http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ > >I particularly like this one: >http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/site/gustave/index.html
Yes, both fine designs. (I was simply pulling my example sites from the list of those that had been proffered up-thread as information sources about default sizes being best). >It is possible, and I don't see why it shouldn't be possible to work >with larger text-sizes and yet arrive at an aesthetic solution. I agree that it should be (and clearly is) possible to create reasonably aesthetically pleasing [1] designs using default text sizes. I found it ironic, however, that the sites telling me to use default sizes failed so spectacularly to provide an aesthetically pleasing solution [2] themselves. >Do forgive me if I have missed the point completely No, you hit it bang on I think. Thanks for your views! -- Rick Lecoat [1] A very subjective judgement call, of course. [2] Again, that's subjective. ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
