Sorry made an error in the second example (url(4) should be url(1)) background-image: url(1), url(2), url(3); background-repeat: top, left, right, bottom;
is equal to background-image: url(1), url(2), url(3), url(1); background-position: top, left, right, bottom; On 11/12/07, James Jeffery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why does 'background-repeat:' determine the number of images to add? > > background-image: url(1), url(2), url(3); > background-repeat: top, left, right, bottom; > > is equal to > > background-image: url(1), url(2), url(3), url(4); > background-position: top, left, right, bottom; > > Would it not be better for it to ignore the extra values on > background-position: if there is no image to go with it ? > > Seems a bit silly to me. > > ******************************************************************* > List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm > Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ******************************************************************* ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
