code for standards compliant browsers and let ie fall where it may.
dwain

On 1/24/08, Ben Buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> crikey, that's some list. thanks Russ.
>
>
> It's disturbing how well lemurs can illustrate the issue, too: 
> http://www.katemonkey.co.uk/article/48/x-ua-lemur-compatible
> (the Zeldman lemur cracked me up completely)
>
> On the issue... it's something MS simply won't back down on no matter what
> any of us think. So we may as well figure out how to deal with it.
>
> Standardistas can go for the "edge" option or they can let IE stagnate at
> IE7 or whatever version ends up being the easiest to develop
> for. Or they can seriously tag their documents according to tested documents.
>
>
> Implementation specifics aside (yes I still think it's spam), the version
> target feature offers us a chance to lock our sites to the most convenient
> version of IE. MS has invited us to ignore their newer products. We can opt
> to save our energy for standards-based browsers and not bother learning new
> versions of IE. Lazy? Pragmatic? Mercenary?
>
> Discuss? :) Surely this list has some opinions...
>
> cheers,
> Ben
>
> --
> --- <http://weblog.200ok.com.au/>
> --- The future has arrived; it's just not
> --- evenly distributed. - William Gibson
> *******************************************************************
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *******************************************************************




-- 
dwain alford
"The artist may use any form which his expression demands;
for his inner impulse must find suitable expression."  Kandinsky


*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************

Reply via email to