Thank you Matt

The value of a specifically defined list is adherence to that set of definitions. Let's hold to the _standards_ of the list as much as we can please. Although, saying that, I find it good to be helpful... so am one of the goodwill exploitees, yes.

One thing though, in the desire to hold to standards, conflicts arise in the creation of code, so we DO have to occasionally debug in order to solve, don't we?

Joe

On Feb 15 2008, at 11:52, Matt Fellows wrote:

With no offense intended to the list moderators, I feel the usefulness of this mailing list is diminishing due to an increase in irrelevant and lazy postings.

The majority of people on this list are genuine web developers, who care for the future of the Web and the place Web Standards has in it. But there seems to be a small number of people who think they can simply post their problems to this list without consulting any other reference.

Basic CSS problems, PHP syntax and even spam help are just a sample of some of these questions that can, and should be either found quickly by a number of popular resources or even a quick search in Google. Instead, they lazily exploit the goodwill of many in this list who are kind enough to visit their site and fix their problems.

With the number of these increasing there is no wonder why people are leaving this list (and publicly doing so).

Out on a limb here - does anybody else feel the same? If so, do you have a suggestion as to how we can better the quality of the list?

Matt


On 2/15/08, John Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please can this be closed? It's far off any standards related topic.


Possibly the only thing I can see as a relevant part of the 'Web 2.0 movement' is the abstraction of the presentational information from data on a page, which isn't being discussed here.


If posting an off-topic message, please at least mark it as such so the rest of us can hit the delete button without checking it first for relevant information!


Kind regards,


John Hancock

Identity


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Ortenzi
Sent: Friday, 15 February 2008 6:32 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [WSG] hello


That's art, Kat, design is different.

And design is a significant part of the web.



On Feb 12 2008, at 22:52, Katrina wrote:


kevin mcmonagle wrote:

yes its a buzzword mostly but from a design standpoint its also a genre.

That's an interesting thought. Is Web 2.0 larger than the web itself? Has it become an art movement/period, in the same way as Modernism, Post-Modernism, Humanism, Impressionism, etc?


Kat



*******************************************************************

List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm

Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm

Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

*******************************************************************



Joe Ortenzi

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

www.joiz.com




*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************


*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************


*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************

Joe Ortenzi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.joiz.com




*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************

Reply via email to