i have written up results from some tests i carried out: Screen Readers lack emphasis - http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/?p=41
On 27/02/2008, tee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Steven, > > > > On Feb 26, 2008, at 6:49 AM, Steven Faulkner wrote: > > > don't know if this has been pointed out yet, but as far as screen > > readers like JAWS and Window Eyes are concerned the strong element > > does not convey any meaning. It is not recognised by them. > > > > > bottom line is that for users these screen readers using strong as > > an indication of a required field won't be of any help. > > > Thanks for the great info. Exactly what I am after. > > I like the way Mike grouped the required elements, will borrow the > idea for the next form. > > > tee > > > ******************************************************************* > List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm > Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ******************************************************************* > > -- with regards Steve Faulkner Technical Director - TPG Europe Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org Web Accessibility Toolbar - http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
