I totally agree .. in fact just having this conversation elsewhere. How can
javascript be more accessible when those most concerned with accessibility
will probably turn it off anyway? Makes no sense to have this removed .. I
open new windows all the time .. for PDFs .. for links that go offsite, etc.
Nancy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Horowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <wsg@webstandardsgroup.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 8:44 AM
Subject: [WSG] a target=” blank” not part of xhtml
I just read how a target=”_blank” is not part of xhtml
Why not. I can't imagine its better practice to replace it with
javascript.
http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2004/01/02/targetblank-xhtml-10-strict-conversion/
--
Michael Horowitz
Your Computer Consultant
http://yourcomputerconsultant.com
561-394-9079
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.1/1345 - Release
Date: 3/26/2008 6:50 PM
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
