On Apr 29, 2008, at 12:41 PM, Joseph Ortenzi wrote:
Most of what I've seen people put into ActiveX and .NET can be done
otherwise by clever developers and still be standards compliant or
at least, cross-browser-compliant.
If you need to write proprietary code that is browser specific you
are not adhering to web standards. either it is important or it
isn't, no fence-sitting allowed..
well, obviously. and furthermore this is the web standards group, so
i thought that it would pretty much go without saying.
I was just making the point that there are (way too) many developers
who are obliged by their employment situation to do things they might
prefer not to, and worse there are others who aren't even aware that
there's a fence.
Just because everyone *could* be writing standards-compliant pages,
sadly that does *not* mean that we can expect that it will become
common practice in the foreseeable future. I would hope it's
reasonable to suppose that everyone in this group is committed to
standards. I'm sorry if it's now heretical to point out that not
everyone shares our commitment, and that some of us are sometimes
obliged to cross the line...
Andrew
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************