Speaking of "centre". W3C ought to implement British English as well. :(
But yeah, the align attribute should be avoided at all cost. If you really want to align something in the centre, use; margin: 0 auto; /Svip 2008/5/3 Essential eBiz Solutions Ltd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > There is the old faithful > > <p align"centre">Image</p> > Which as far as I'm aware is valid in XHTML strict, or the method Stuart > mentioned with the pre-set div tag. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Stuart Foulstone > Sent: 03 May 2008 10:37 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: R: [WSG] Alternative to align = center? > > Or use a CSS class to do the same, > > <div class="centre" > > > and > > .centre { > text-align: center; > } > > On Sat, May 3, 2008 10:22 am, Diego La Monica wrote: > > What about <div style="text-align: center"> ? > > > > > > > > > > > > Diego La Monica > > > > Web 2.0 - Standards - Accessibilità > > > > mobile: +39 3337235382 - skype: diego.la.monica > > > > web: http://diegolamonica.info - http://jastegg.it > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > Da: Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Inviato: sabato 3 maggio 2008 11.15 > > A: [email protected] > > Oggetto: [WSG] Alternative to align = center? > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I know that the align attribute such as <div align="center"> is not > > allowed > > in XHTML Strict, but it got me thinking on what the possible alternatives > > are for a dynamic environment such as a forum? > > > > > > > > For instance if I know the image width or the total width of all the > > images > > will be the same I usually put them in a wrapper with a fixed width and > > use > > margin: 5px auto as an example. > > > > > > > > What happens if you will never know the width of the images or how many > > images someone may post, as happens on a forum I run. I've resorted to > > creating a bbcode tag that uses <div align="center"> as that is the only > > way > > I can think of. > > > > > > > > Are these scenarios always doomed to use transitional doctypes and > > deprecated code? > > > > > > > > I'd be interested in your opinions > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > Simon > > > > > > ******************************************************************* > > List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm > > Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ******************************************************************* > > > > > > ******************************************************************* > > List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm > > Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ******************************************************************* > > > > > > > ******************************************************************* > List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm > Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ******************************************************************* > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG. > Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.7/1410 - Release Date: 01/05/2008 > 17:30 > > > > > > > ******************************************************************* > List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm > Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ******************************************************************* > > ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
